The
male gaze objectifies the viewed subject; this viewed subject more often than
not being female. Within the mainstream media, women are placed on display, as
mere objects for male viewing pleasure. Although these images are also being
seen by women, the effect that these images (let’s say a Victoria’s Secret ad)
has on women, is adversely different. These commercials, magazine ads, and
billboards are all on display for the male viewer to enjoy. Although the
consumers of the advertised products are women, the target audience is men. A
man most probably directed the commercials and photo shoots with the implicit
goal of creating something for his fellow male viewer to enjoy. I believe that
if women were the ones in charge of these images, the outcome would be a lot
less interesting for men, and a lot more informative and in tuned with what
women are concerned about when buying these products.
In
“Ways Of Seeing” by John Berger, he discusses the differences in meaning behind
a man and a woman’s presence. In one section,
he talks about the painting, The Allegory of Time and Love, by Bronzino
and states that Venus’s body arrangement in the painting is to appeal to the
male viewer’s sexuality rather than her
own. “…The woman’s sexual passion needs to be minimized so that the spectator may
feel that he has the monopoly of such passion. Women are there to feed an
appetite, not to have any of their own” (Berger, 55).This statement in my
opinion is very strong, and speaks to the way that many images and thoughts in
the media are conceived. When examining almost any ad in a magazine, commercial
on television, and even most film, there is almost always a “sexy” woman
present. Selling a car – sexy woman. Selling a burger – sexy woman. Selling
shampoo – sexy woman moaning unnecessarily in an airplane bathroom while
washing her hair (which seems rather illogical because there isn’t much space
and I don’t recall here being a hair dryer present the last time I was on
a plane).
However, these recurring
images of hyper-sexualized women seem to only appeal to the American white male
standard of beautiful or sexy. Although many people (men and women alike) would
agree that some of these images are sexy, overall I question whether or not a
woman’s idea of sexy is being captured. It is certain that a male view of
“sexy” is prevalent within our mainstream media, however, what is a woman’s
idea of the word? What is sexy to a woman?
Most
women, that I have spoken to define sexy using words, such as confident, strong
presence, intelligence, etc. A lot of which comes from within. When I’ve asked girls,
there tends to be a name associated with the definition, such as Kim
Kardashian, Beyonce, Rihanna, etc. My reasoning for creating the distinction
between women and girls, is that the womenI have spoken to, are older and generally a bit less
consumed with what is portrayed in the media. Girls, on the other hand seem to
be a lot more impressionable and brainwashed into conforming to the White
American male view of sexy. Not to say that women do not also internalize these
portrayals, I am just stating it seems
as though a woman 30+ is less
likely to be as emotionally invested and overwhelmed by this oppression than a
teenaged girl enveloped by the media. What’s sad is that girls are becoming
women with these same socially embedded ideals, and are living
life with this constant mission to live up to societal standards of beauty and
consistently striving to please the male viewer.
The
oppositional gaze challenges the mainstream, white supremacist way of thinking.
It originally sought to fight against the stereotypes portrayed in the media.
Blacks looked at what was being displayed on television and movie screens though interrogative gazes
(Hooks, 117). Although Black men and women were both being racially stereotyped
and exploited through inaccurate white representation, the oppositional,
interrogating gaze of African Americans (men) was there to challenge the racism
and domination by whites. Gender politics were rarely a discussion (Hooks, 118).
The oppositional gaze however seems to fuel racism and segregation, rather
than deconstruct it.
After
reading through these pieces, I have been really enlightened, and in a sense
awakened. Although I was aware of the problems of racism and sexism within the media,
I don’t particularly analyze or pay attention to just how serious a problem it
is until I am put in a position to pay attention. Unfortunately, ridding our
society of these culturally embedded toxins would be complex, and is not as simple
as I would hope it to be.
Ok I'm not going to lie, I chose your post to read based solely on the title. Sex sells, who would have thought.
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting to imagine what advertisements would be like if women were, as you put it, 'in charge'. Whether there would be a difference, and what that difference would be, depends on a few things. The first question that jumps to mind is: what does being 'in charge' actually mean? If the crew were comprised of women, but were still operating in society as we know it, I would imagine the ad would work the same way. However if women were in charge politically - say, to the extent that men are today - I lack the imagination to picture what the ad would be like. Sadly.
I'm glad you found the readings enlightening. I did too.